Mobile Version: mobile.theintermountain.com
 
RSS:
Elkins Weather Forecast, WV
Elkins Weather Forecast, WV
»BREAKING NEWS» School Dismissals
Member Login: Email: Password:
Search: Local News Classified EZToUseBigBook Web
Home  News  Obituaries  Sports  Arts & Living  Communities  Special Sections  Local Classifieds  Jobs  CU Galleries


  • Pirates Report
  • Religion
  • Real Estate
  • Classifieds
  • Online Extras
  • Customer Service
  • Affiliated Sites
Local News

Licwov acquitted on child porn charges

By BEN SIMMONS, Staff Writer
POSTED: November 5, 2009

A Beverly man was found innocent of child pornography charges Monday in U.S. District Court in Elkins after a jury deliberated for nearly three hours.

Vincent Licwov had been charged with one count of possessing computer disks containing images of child pornography that had been transported in interstate commerce, a felony.

Attorney Scott Curnutte, who represented Licwov in the case, said the jury's decision to return a not guilty verdict was the right choice.

"This has been a nightmare for the Licwov family," Curnutte said. "Allegations like this hang like a cloud while the case is pending, and it is difficult for the whole family. Fortunately, the jury absolved Vincent with its verdict of not guilty, and the Licwov family can see the sun shining again. I am very happy for them."

Assistant U.S. Attorney Stephen D. Warner presented the government's case before U.S. District Judge John P. Bailey.

The case was investigated by Immigration and Customs Enforcement and was brought forth as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abused.

 
Share:
Facebook  MySpace  Digg  Stumble    Mixx  Fark  del.icio.us   LiveSpaces
 
Member Comments
View Comments: | 1-1 | Post a comment
cannonball
11-06-09 8:35 AM
I would like to know the reasoning that the jury found the verdict they did. Not enough information pretaining to the validity of the verdict. What was the reason that this person was not held responsible for what he was charged? Just wondering.

You must first login before you can comment.
Existing Member Login
Not a Member?
Create a Member Account  
*Your email address:
*Password:
    Forgot Password?
  Remember my email address.
 
Home  News  Obituaries  Sports  Arts & Living  Communities  Special Sections  Local Classifieds  Jobs  CU Galleries